SB 1300 Would Make IDFG Director a Governor Appointee
A new bill introduced this session, SB 1300, would once again make the Director of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game a gubernatorial political appointee. While the language may look slightly different from similar legislation that was proposed last year, the outcome is the same, ultimately transferring appointment authority away from the Idaho Fish and Game Commission and placing it directly in the Governor’s hands. This deserves the attention of every hunter, angler, and wildlife supporter in Idaho. The Fish and Game Commission is charged with overseeing the Department - without the ability to appoint and remove the Director, the Commission’s ability to carry this out would be meaningfully reduced.
The Fish and Game Commission was created in 1938 through a voter initiative, supported by 76% of Idahoans at the time, specifically to reduce the influence of shifting political priorities in wildlife management. Under Idaho’s long-standing wildlife conservation system, the director of IDFG is appointed by the Fish and Game Commission, a bipartisan body representing all regions of our state. That approach has helped keep wildlife management grounded in science and the public trust, not political winds. It is also an important safeguard to protect our hunting rights long-term.
Why This Matters for Wildlife and Sportsmen
Politicizing wildlife leadership undermines science-based management.
Independent commissions have traditionally insulated wildlife policy from short-term politics, ensuring that hunting seasons, habitat conservation, predator management, and other critical decisions are grounded in biology, not partisan agendas. Making the director a political appointee opens the door to decisions based on election cycles rather than ecological realities and hunter / angler priorities.
Decades of positive conservation outcomes are at risk.
Idaho’s system has helped create some of the best big-game opportunities in the country and manage fish and wildlife resources with broad public support. Replacing that with a governor-centric appointment process could erode the bipartisan stewardship Idaho sportsmen and women have fought to maintain.
Across the West, critics of wildlife agency political control point out that when leadership is subject to political turnover, institutional memory and long-range planning suffer. Technical expertise can be sidelined in favor of political loyalty, leaving wildlife management vulnerable to special interests.
Hunters & Anglers: Speak Up
Your Voice Makes a Difference. Now is the time to tell legislators you oppose this change and you want Idaho’s wildlife management to stay independent and science-based.
